뒤로
E

Edgar José Henríquez Rojas 선생님이 Class2Class.org에 "Testing Cognitive Integration in Practice" 프로젝트를 만들었습니다

참여 요청
중지됨
공개
다른 학급과 함께하기

Testing Cognitive Integration in Practice

어떤 프로젝트인가요?

Students investigate how divergent and convergent thinking alternate in real tasks, collecting data from local teachers and partner classes. They analyze which classroom designs best support integrated thinking and present evidence-based comparisons.
학생 연령
18세 이상
진행 기간
16 주
시작 월
11월 2026

이 프로젝트는 다음 국제 목표에 기여합니다

이 프로젝트는 다음 아동 권리를 알리고 지킵니다

학습 성과

Students will be able to identify and describe how divergent and convergent thinking alternate across real tasks in their local classrooms and partner classes.
기억 / 이해
Students will be able to use a shared data collection protocol to gather evidence on integrated thinking from local teachers and partner class students.
적용
Students will be able to compare and contrast classroom designs from different countries to differentiate which best support integrated critical thinking and creative problem-solving.
분석
Students will be able to evaluate, through collaborative evidence-based reports, which classroom design best supports integrated thinking across diverse international contexts.
평가

기르는 역량

비판적 사고와 문제 해결
창의성과 혁신
협업과 팀워크

프로젝트 활동

1

Kick-off video call and shared data protocol

Students meet their partner class by video, introduce themselves, and agree on a shared way to record examples of divergent and convergent thinking in real tasks. Each class explains how they will gather evidence from local teachers and students.

소요 시간: 240분
2

Field research: observing thinking in real tasks

Students observe lessons and tasks in their local classrooms, interview teachers, and collect examples of when thinking shifts between generating ideas and choosing the best one. They record their findings using the shared protocol and share the data with the partner class.

소요 시간: 1,800분
3

Cross-country data analysis and classroom design comparison

Working in mixed international teams, students combine the collected data and compare the classroom designs of both countries. They identify which features seem to best support integrated critical thinking and creative problem-solving.

소요 시간: 2,400분
4

Evidence-based collaborative report

Teams draft a joint report that evaluates which classroom design best supports integrated thinking across the two contexts. They use their data to justify conclusions and give each other structured peer feedback to revise their work.

소요 시간: 2,400분
5

Final showcase and reflection

Students present their comparisons and recommendations to the partner class and local teachers in a shared video session. They reflect individually and together on how their own thinking and collaboration changed during the project.

소요 시간: 960분